Rezzly reads your association's CC&Rs, amendments, and board resolutions, then finds the clause behind any violation and drafts a notice that cites it, ready for you to review. Research that used to eat an hour takes a couple of minutes, and you get that time back for the work that matters.
No contract to look. Bring one real case.
How it works
And you don't do step one alone. A Rezzly employee handles the full setup with you, loads every governing document, and stays with you until your first cited violation goes out.
Step 1
CC&Rs, architectural rules, bylaws, amendments, board resolutions. Rezzly reads all of it once.
Step 2
On site from your phone or later at your desk. Photographic and written evidence both work.
Step 3
Rezzly checks the evidence against the documents, shows the clause it relies on, and drafts the notice. You review both and decide what gets sent.
Case study
Before Rezzly, finding the citation behind a single violation meant an hour inside governing documents, and time away from the things that mattered. Here is what changed in the first few weeks.
Every violation starts the same way: someone reports something, and the manager has to prove it against the documents. For Mike that meant opening the CC&Rs, the amendments, and whatever board resolution touched the same subject, then reading until the right clause turned up.
Rezzly ingests the association's CC&Rs, amendments, and board resolutions and builds a model of what each one actually governs. Mike describes a violation in plain language; the AI returns the controlling clause, its section number, and the surrounding language, plus the source page to check it against.
Rezzly drafts each notice with the governing language quoted and the correction spelled out, in the same clear format across every association Mike manages. He reviews the finding and the draft, adjusts anything he wants, and only then does it go out. More owners resolve the issue at the courtesy notice stage.
Photos, inspection notes, the citation, every notice sent, and each follow-up live together in a single case. When Mike moves between associations or picks a violation back up weeks later, the full history is already there.
“The notice language is far more effective than anything I was writing myself. Violations get resolved before they turn into real problems.”
What the difference looks like
Drafted by hand
During the 4 September inspection, the fence at 1428 Cedar Court was observed stained a color that has not been approved. Please submit an ARC request or restore the approved finish by 25 September.
A solid notice. Finding and quoting the governing rule is still up to the manager.
Drafted in Rezzly
Hello neighbor,
During the 4 September inspection, the fence at 1428 Cedar Court was observed stained a color not submitted for architectural review.
CC&R Article VII, Section 3
No exterior surface shall be painted, stained, or refinished in a color other than one approved in writing by the Architectural Review Committee.
Please submit an ARC request or restore the approved finish by 25 September.
Thank you, Your HOA Admin Team Sunset Homeowners Association
The same details, with the governing language quoted. Drafted in minutes, reviewed by the manager before it's sent.
Illustrative example, not a live resident record.
“It has changed how I run enforcement. I'm not dreading the research anymore.”
Twenty minutes, your own governing documents, one real case. You'll see the citation and the draft notice before the call ends, and if you move ahead, we do the setup for you.
Or email hello@rezzly.co
See it against your own documents, in 20 minutes.
Book a demo